Hello Saba.
You may use the email lfsxs@mailbox.org and the passport number YE528452.
However, I don't need to sign anything. A contract you "need to sign" is coercion.
Let's make sure the terms are fair and agreeable, and I will have no problem compensating Next for their services, despite Next never having extended any offer of compensation for the massive disruption they caused us during our renovation and after our move here, nor anytime our utilities were interrupted, even without warning.
Regards, Luís

Hi,

It would have been necessary then, that these agreements be presented to me at the time of the purchase of the apartment. Next has failed to inform me of their existence, and so I have consented to nothing. I can't have consented to something I didn't read or didn't even know existed.

The problem earlier was that your sales team allowed us to join the two apartments at the specified line, claiming they consulted with your engineers. Then, your engineer (Shota) embargoed our renovation, only to allow it much later. Then, after the front wall had been built, Shota demanded it be destroyed and rebuilt further in, not only reducing the size of our apartment, but changing the renovation plans. It's not (mostly) about the pipes. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy of Next to wish to be compensated by us when they were omissive about compensating us for their inexcusable negligence and incompetence. If the management at Next had any character, they would have offered to compensate us for the troubles they caused before demanding any compensation from us.

Despite all of this, and despite me not having consented to any agreement, I am not a parasite and wish to pay for the services. But I would like the service terms to be fair, and am stressing that Next does not have the right to compel me to agree to arbitrary terms of service, so I reserve the right not to sign any contract, if I do not deem it to be fair.

Let me know when you have a version for me to review.

My apartment is my private property.
I don't have to sign anything that allows another company to "manage" my property.
I don't have to give anyone warnings about when I am coming in and out of my property.
I do not owe Next any retroactive payment that I did not consent with.
You don't get to unilaterally change the rules of usage of the common areas.
And you don't get to incur only 10 Lari for each day you would break an eventual agreement.
These papers are a joke.
From this moment on I am considering Next to be acting in bad faith.
I will consult my legal rights regarding this case.

Then I decide that Next owes me one million dollars for the damages and inconveniences they caused in our renovation.
Please pay me US$ 999,392 by the end of next month and we are even.
I will not give anyone the right to manage my property.

As I stated before, I don't have a problem compensating you for you services.
The problem is that you are abusing this as a pretext to put my property under your management and control.
It's not only about the compensation and you know it.
And high standard? The building is half under construction, there's foam in the service elevator, and we slept without electricity because you couldn't contact a technician. I also have to trust your word that you delivered my apartment with gas working, and that somehow the renovators damaged a plastic pipe embedded in concrete. Your buffon of an engineer could not bother to look across the hall to see it was possible to connect two apartments. Lola just lies and buys time in the service line. Give me a break.
I will have to find out what my rights are by someone trustworthy, and this person is not from Next.

Oh, and one more thing, our apartment has less than 100 square meters, thanks to the bullshit Shota pulled on us. You will not charge for the space Next stole from us.

If you prepare me a simple contract, listing the services you provide and the price of 100 USD per month for the services, I will sign it.
I will even show good faith and cover the US$600, despite that being well under what Next owes us for their previous transgressions.
However, do not state you can change the rules of the building unilaterally, do not place fines upon me that are not proportional to the fines Next is willing to pay for their breaches and do not take legal rights to my apartment.
That is fair. What you sent me is outrageous.
Pass this on to your colleague please.

One more thing. The previous owner does not recollect signing any such documents you mentioned.
If you'd like to maintain that he did, please show them to me.

Are they calling or will it be a message?

Hello, good morning, we still have not heard from him.

Hi, I did not receive any calls.
I will write to her shortly.

Ok, thank you.

Hello Saba. You were right, and the payment indeed was cancelled. I have the money back in my account. I'll come down and pay as soon as possible.

Ok, please let me know. I definitely have the money back, and the transaction to Next does not show up anymore.

Hi, sorry for the delay. We'll pay it tomorrow or weekend at the latest.

Hi, I'll come down between 15:00 and 16:00.

Saba,

Because of the frankly surreal bad faith you and Next demonstrated in our communications (and continue to demonstrate in this message), I have chosen to make all of our past correspondence public in an online dossier. You should know that all further correspondence between us, including this one, will also be published there.

https://next-dossier.ar.io/

The last time we spoke was in the following email thread:

https://next-dossier.ar.io/en/email/levan-lies-refuted.html

A company acting in good faith would restart our communications from where they left it off, and acknowledge the point I made very clearly that conditioning a co-owner's usage of common property to the payment of a sum, especially one you decided on unilaterally and without contract, is a crime. I explain this even more clearly in the dossier:

https://next-dossier.ar.io/en/page/criminal-arrogation.html

I ask you, Saba, directly, clearly and unequivocally, to cease committing crimes against me, my family, and my property. You saw me and my wife climbing seventeen flights of stairs from your office. At times we were not physically well, and at others we hauled groceries and drinking water. Once we made eye contact. I really would like to believe that you have a conscience.

I owe Next no debt. The only two places it could possibly arise from are the falsified contract drafts you sent me on January 28, 2026, which I promptly refused to sign, and the statutory contribution to the Homeowners' Association, which is towards other owners via the Association, not towards Next. You have never established the basis for the debt, even after you were invited to in writing. That you charge a debt whose basis you can't identify is unacceptable.

If you would like to collect money from me, the law offers you two avenues:

1. Pursue that in court.
2. Have a meeting of owners of Next White to elect a chairman or establish a charter and publish the expenses, which must be approved in meetings.

To collect debts established by 2, you still cannot resort to the elevators, because modifications or transfer for use of the elevators require unanimity among owners, and I have previously stated that I do not consent to elevators that operate under the permission of Next or any other third party, and unequivocally do so now. Instead, the Homeowners' Association should register the debt against my apartments.

The director of Next Hospitality stated in his email that "Any legal dispute shall be addressed in accordance with the procedure established by law before the relevant authorities". Following his advice, I have started to follow that procedure, which is exhaustingly difficult for a foreigner, especially abroad. I will seek every remedy the law provides against Next's deeply unethical conduct.

Your offer for chips is noted. I will ask you to provide them to my representative, whose identification details I will provide once you confirm you will hand him the chips. If you will only provide them to me in person, please register that the offer will be extended until I am able to return to Georgia. I will also make an explicit request for you to unconditionally activate them, as I will not pay you money that I don't owe you.

Note that your previous position was that the Act of Handover did not contain a waiver of claims, that it would not be amended and that signature was required, with you having rejected my offer to receive chips against a simple receipt (https://next-dossier.ar.io/en/email/record-of-the-meeting-corrections.html). Please tell me what changed.

Please pass the dossier to your legal team, and come back with a simpler answer. Will you cease to place conditions on my use of the property that I co-own, including the elevators, yes or no?

Finally, I note that, as written in the dossier itself, your corrections are invited and welcome, truly. Please note that, very unfortunately, two of my computing devices suddenly malfunctioned, and it may be some more time before I can update the dossier, I estimate no more than a week.

Saba, since it seems you are incapable of responding to my message adequately, including giving answers to my requests, please pass it to someone at Next who is.

I will point out Levan has ended our communications by ignoring my email.
I have no desire to pursue a conversation with someone who behaves like he does.

Saba,

You say my accusations are unfounded. The dossier invites corrections and states its sources; tell me which accusation lacks one and I will correct it. If you cannot name one, "unfounded" is simply the word you chose for "unanswered".

I did not portray you as anything. What speaks against you is not my words but your own, in writing: that the chips will not be active until a debt you cannot identify is paid. That message is the clearest confirmation yet that the lockout is a means of collection, and your reply to my questions about it was to decline to answer and refer me to a director who has been silent since August 18.

I did say you seemed incapable of answering my requests. Your answer confirmed it.

Luís